In today’s world
we see many different random things on the internet like memes, fake science
reports or even random comics that do not make sense. Most people view these as
funny or disregard them as idiotic wastes of time. Most do not know however, that
each of these different things are their own genre. They have their own way of
doing things. Each one of the three aforementioned genres has their conventions
and rhetorical aspects that make each of them unique.
With SCIgen genre generator it
produces scientifically oriented fake reports. These reports are their own
genre. The conventions for the genres generated by this generator are quite
random. For example, each one contains a scientific title like, On the Simulation of E-Commerce, or something that is similar to that. It contains an abstract or brief
description of the content of the report or experiment. Then it has a table of
contents which gives the name of the titles of which the information in the
report will fall under. It has an introduction which gives a description of the
basis of the experiment and what the experimenters are attempting to do.
Following there is a related content section which contains any information
from other sources that pertains to the experiment. After this, it has the
design portion which gives diagrams of key parts pf the experiment that will be
used. After the design is shown it shows the processes used in order to gain
results. It then gives results of what should occur in a perfect situation.
Following the results, it then provides the experimental results which were
obtained after doing the experiment. Then the conclusion compares the two
results for any margin of error to determine if the experiment was a success or
not.
The Pandyland comic generator produces random,
crude comic strips. The conventions for this genre are quite weird. First each
strip starts off with a random quote from one of the two character. Then the
second part contains a retort from the second character that has little to
nothing to do with the previous part. Then third and final piece of the comic
strip is a totally random ending that has nothing to do with the previous two
parts. The main convention of this comic strip is that none of the parts have
anything to do with each other but are all funny in their own way. Another
thing that could be considered a convention is that the same two characters are
used and they never change.
The meme generator is by far the most humorous of
three with its random photos and comments. First the meme must have a photo
that people will find funny. Then it is followed by a quote that is attempting
to elicit laughter from readers. In this genre there really isn’t that many
conventions since it literally is made up of a picture and a quote nothing
more, nothing less.
Thinking about what occurs in these websites can
help someone better understand genre because it provides different pieces of
writing than many are used too. If one where to think about what occurs in
these websites it opens them to more possible knowledge. For example, if one
looks past the random content of the report, one can see the organization of
the paper and the genre it belongs. One can begin to see the conventions associated
with the genre. Trying to understand what is happening with these website
allows people to begin to be able to look at a paper belonging to any genre and
then begin discerning its conventions and different aspects. With the SCIgen
generator it produced papers that were set-up in the style of a scientific
report. Most would try to read through the paper and see the content of the
paper but they would not understand the genre. If one were to look over the
paper and not read it, someone could begin to see what makes this paper a paper
and what makes the genre a genre. Thinking about the pandyland comic generator can
allow be people to understand that not all genres are clean-cut and defined as
many would think. Some are crude and do not make sense like the comics produced
by this generator but it is a genre with its own style and conventions. It can
allow someone to understand while something may not appear to be a genre in
their eyes it is indeed one no matter how far-fetched it would seem. Finally,
the meme generator again allows someone to see that genres come in many forms.
Memes contain a seemingly humorous photo and a quote that when combined attempt
to be funny. These two things are the main conventions of a meme. Thinking
about how a meme genre, then seeing that is in fact its own genre can allow
someone to understand that genres come in many forms and never notice them.
All in all, thinking about what occurs in the genre
generators allows someone to better understand genre by opening their eyes to
the fact that genres come in many different forms. From a scientific report to
a simple meme, these are all their own genre. Also, thinking about what occurs
in on these websites allows one to understand that to properly analyze a paper
and the genre it belongs too one must keep their mind open to new things that
may catch one off guard.


So I agree with your argument that these genre generators show that genres come in different forms. When it comes to the meme genre, there are actually several conventions that go with it. Its appearance may be just a quote and a picture, but the descriptions of how the quote is made up and the type of picture are other, more detailed, conventions of the genre. For example, the quotes are made with big, white block letters that are outlined in black and located on the top and bottom of the picture to add focus to the image in the picture.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIberri-Gutierrez,
ReplyDelete(I accidentally put the "i" before the "t" of your last name on my first post.)
That’s fantastic to hear how much you like to read. Keep that creative spark lit, my friend. ☺
One quick note before I continue: you might want to consider adjusting the # of posts setting on your blogger settings—it seems to be only show 3 at a time (i.e., your autobio blurb isn’t visible).
Re: PB1A, personal letters are, indeed, a specific genre. Hannah mentioned in her blog that they “sho[w] people you care,” and that’s definitely a convention of handwritten letters. I like how you mentioned that the length and audience can change—that just goes to show that some of these flexible conventions are more flexible than others.
Re: PB1B, boo bam, you nailed it with this line: “All in all, thinking about what occurs in the genre generators allows someone to better understand genre by opening their eyes to the fact that genres come in many different forms. From a scientific report to a simple meme, these are all their own genre.” Yessir—that’s exactly what we were shootinf for. I’ve written this on some other folks’ blogs, and I’d like to include it here too: with memes, the white capitalized font is outlined in black. Why would that be? Well, this way, the language can be displayed on any kind of background without getting drowned out. Also consider: what’s the content of pictures that are typically used? (Usually pop culture references, although some grainy “homemade” pictures are typically used too.) These are the sorts of angles and questions that I want us to develop an eye for.
The more questions you/we can ask ourselves about all of the different elements that go into any one given genre, the better off we’ll be. Use that “Genre Analysis” handout in our course reader to help you think through some of these beneath-the-radar questions.
Good work here, Iberri-Gutierrez. Keep it up.
Z
Jonathan,
ReplyDeleteI think you really hit the spot with your analysis of the SciGen generator. The weirdly descriptive title, brief description, introduction, table of contents, graphs, etc. were all clearly conventions of these essays. What i liked most about your analysis was sure people can just look at essays and find some patterns; however, you went so far as to dissect the conclusion and find that in multiple essays they "the conclusion compares the two results for any margin of error to determine if the experiment was a success or not".
You did this for not only the SciGen but foreach generator and found many unique things that I wish I noted in my PB1B. For example, when looking at the PandyLand generator I noted that the same characters would come up multiple times but I felt that it wasn't a big of deal to note but after going over in class it is best to be as narrow and specific as possible and noting even the shoelaces of the characters if possible.
In sum, I think you did a great job and finding the many conventions that make up even the silliest of comic strips, essays, or memes.
Great job on your analysis'! You were spot on about the structural conventions of the CS report generator. I liked how you explained the step-by-step layout of them. Although you didn't talk about the actual form of writing and audience on the comic strip generator, you did a great job explaining the content. I totally agree with you about the different slides not having anything to do with each other , and how the first doesn't even connect to the last. I addition, I liked how you talked about the simplicity of the meme generator and how there wasn't much to them. It was cool that you talked about audience there and how the picture actually has to be comical so that the viewer will think it's funny and want to pay any attention to it. Your analysis explaining how these can better understand conventions in the real world was really good too. I agree with you that it can help us identify something with a genre even if it doesn't seem that way, which can help us better understand the rhetoric of the piece. Nice job!
ReplyDelete